In article interpretation a sight by M. Voloshin, the Ukrainian origin, tragically events of the beginning of the XXth century is offered.

The article is describing the views of Olgerd Bochkovsky (1885–1939), a distinguished Ukrainian social scientist, specialising on national rebirth, and a theorist of a new sociological discipline — natiology, on the national renaissance period among the non-state nations of Europe

The article covers the period of life and research of Petr Abramovich during the period of the Ukrainian Revolution of 1917–1921. His personal foundation was the basis of the research, which was preserved in the State Archive of Zhytomyr Region. It has a significant scientific value, which allows you to add information about a scientist, putting in circulation new documents and revealing the potential of his personal fund.

The introduction of a biographical installation into the scientific discourse as a form and method of reconstructing the biography of H. P. Zhytetsky (1866–1926), in whose life the Ukrainian revolution became a turning point, is substantiated. The biography of the revolutionary era is conceived as a kind of socio-psychological phenomenon, which embodies network interweaving, mobility, transformation of various philosophical, psychological, and behavioral elements of the person in extreme conditions.

The article deals with the history of public activity of M. Sadovsky and the Sadovsky Theatre during the revolutionary events of 1917–1919 in Kyiv.

The purpose of the article is to systematize and comprehend the content of the publications of the famous critic, publicist, and literary historian Sergiy Yefremov (1876–1939) on the pages of the bibliographic magazine “Knyhar: litopys ukrainskoho pysmenstva”. There are 47 reviews, bibliographic notes, bibliographic and literary articles, two obituaries for the memory of I. Shrag and M. Tugan-Baranovsky, an article about the Denikin’s destruction of Ukrainian editions.

Considered the bibliological heritage of the Ukrainian scientist M. I.Yasinsky (1889–1967) on the subject of novelty in the methodology of the study of the history of bibliography in Ukraine. The stages of scientific and professional activity, in which the process of creative evolution of scientific thought of the scientist passed was realized. The content of the methodological concept concerning the history of bibliography. Conclusions are made regarding the social origins of the formation of a scientific concept.

In the article the quantitative composition of «Brotherhood of Tarasivtsi » — one of the earliest Ukrainian political proindepent organization, was analyzed and which of its participants contributed to the revolutionary events of 1917–1921 was determined. The influence of the Ukrainian Revolution on the life`s ways of «Tarasivtsi» was noted. It has been found that for most of them, the Revolution became the last active phase of activity and only a few were able to continue their own scientific and political career.

The article defines the role and importance of the Ukrainian revolution of 1917–1921 years in the lives of Odesa historians. Found that most historians of Odesa were not part of the main driving forces Ukrainization processes in the city.

The purpose of this article is to study how, during the era of the Ukrainian Revolution of 1917–1921, the images of the heroes of the Ukrainian past were formed and used in the historical thought of Southern Ukraine. It is pointed out that in those years Southern Ukraine was embraced by the general process of forming a new Ukrainian memory about its national heroes.

The article is devoted to an under-examined problem of ordinary participants of the Ukrainian revolution of 1917–1921. The life of Mykola Zherlitsyn, an active Simon Petlioura’s supporter, elected to the Congress of working people of Ukraine from Katerynoslav province is highlighted. The cases of the Soviet secret police are analyzed as a historical source of composition and characteristics of participants of the Ukrainian revolution. The conclusion: the actively promoted stereotype about pro-Russian residents of the South Ukraine was erroneous.