|
|
|
Reply to Contacted Person :: |
|
|
| On Dated : | 2/9/2025 12:00:00 AM | | Contact Name : | KaithaGag | | Email ID : | kathleensjonesg55@gmail.com | | Subject : | bcev The tragedy of Dan Rather
| | Message : | Ibhl Children increasingly used as weapons of war, Unicef warns
The campaign by the Trump administration against the World Health Organization has often seemed faintly preposterous.Over the months of the coronavirus pandemic [url=https://www.stanley-cup.com.de]stanley cup[/url] its untruths and hyperbole have been dismissed by many as iterations of Trumpspeak, whose main purpose has been to distract from the USs catas [url=https://www.stanley-cups.com.es]termo stanley[/url] trophic response to Covid-19, which has claimed almost 140,000 lives and devastated the economy.In recent weeks, however, the actions of the Trump administration have moved from dodgy dossiers and fake claims to a far more sinister agenda, and one with real world consequences that may result in more lives lost, not least in the developing world.After announcing the withdrawal of the US from the WHO, secretary of state Mike Pompeo has levelled an extraordinary series of accusations against the global health bodys head, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, denouncing him to a private meeting of British MPs as essentially an agent of Beijing and suggesting the WHO was responsible for British deaths.Coming hard on the heels of the Trump administrations successful pressure to push the Chinese firm Huawei out of this countrys 5G network, the suspicion must be that the US is now lobbying for support from the UK for its destructive line against the UN health body.WHO s Covid-19 inquiry is a shrewd move in a sea of disinformationRead moreThis matters for multiple reasons. The WHO 鈥?bureaucratic, inefficient and slow-moving as it can be 鈥?serves a fundamental pur [url=https://www.stanleymug.us]stanley website[/url] pose as the primary clearing house Haql 800 years after the Magna Carta, does Britain have a free press
A draft law before Iraq s parliament that would legalise the marriage of girls as young as nine and restrict women s rights in matters of parenting, divorce and inheritance is a political move to define the identity of the country s majority Shias before next month s election, officials say.The law, which was approved by Iraq s council of ministers two weeks ago, has generated widespread debate in Iraq six weeks before the first national poll since US forces departed. International human rights groups have described it as a disastrous regression in the status of women.The 30 April ballot is set to be contested in a cauldron of geopolitical issues, such as the reinvigorated insurgency in Anbar province, the raging war in neighbouring Syria and a continuing dearth of services. But social issues 鈥?brought to prominence by the proposed law 鈥?are now also likely to feature in the debate, with secular and Islamic leaders anxious to define the social fabric of Iraq [url=https://www.cup-stanley-cup.de]stanley thermobecher[/url] s largest sect.The law was pu [url=https://www.stanley-cup.lt]stanley termosas[/url] t forward by Iraq s justice minister, who heads the Fadila party, which has seven seats in the national parliament and is allied with the prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki. Its endorsement by the council of ministers was a prerequisite for a vote in the 325-seat assembly. Observers say Iraq s Shia religious authorities are split over how to react to a debate that has roots in Islamic jurisprudence.Known as the Jaafari pe [url=https://www.stanley-cups.it]stanley cup[/url] rsonal status law, a reference to the Shia imam of that name, the draft law |
| Reply : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|