|
|
|
Reply to Contacted Person :: |
|
|
| On Dated : | 7/11/2025 12:00:00 AM | | Contact Name : | Ranandywrari | | Email ID : | ojanonciliano@gmail.com | | Subject : | araq BBC Films unveils 25th anniversary slate
| | Message : | Mlki John Zois to lead IM Global acquisitions
Channel 4 today confirmed the appointment of Mark Thompson, currently BBC director of televisio [url=https://www.cup-stanley.uk]stanley uk[/url] n, as its chief executive.Thompson replaces Michael Jackson, who left to become president and ch [url=https://www.cups-stanley-cups.us]stanley cup[/url] ief executive of USA Entertainment in October. He will leave the BBC after Christmas, but not take up his new job until March 2002. Thompson is expected to earn more than $700,000 拢500,000 a year, around double his BBC salary.Although he has no private-sector experience, Thompson will have to quickly get to grips with reshaping Channel 4 s commercial strategy. It has recently launched two digital networks, E4 and Film Four, and has had to make substantial cutbacks in its interactive division. Additionally, there is persistent talk that the UK government aims for partial privatisation of the channel in the next few years. The central role he has played in the development and realisation of the BBC s digital strategy combined with his long career in programme-making, mean he is ideally suited to lead Channel Four, said Channel 4 chairman Vanni Treves in a statement. Long seen as BBC director general Greg Dyke s successor, Thompson was previously, director of national and regional broadcasting. He was appointed editor of the Nine O Clock News in 1988 and editor of Panorama in 1990. He became head of features in 1992 and head of factual programmes in 1994, playing a key role in the performance of both BBC TV channels and introducing ser [url=https://www.cup-stanley.uk]stanley cup[/url] ies such as Animal Hospital, Modern Times, The House Nbhz Malin Akerman to star with Ethan Hawke in The Numbers Station
The exclusion of Selmas David Oyelowo from the Oscar nominations is more than a snub - its an injustice.I am not an Oscar voter so I cant pretend to inhabit the mind of one.What I am is a lover of film and a close watcher of the awards race. As such, I was hugely disappointed at the exclusion of Selmas David Oyelowo in the best actor Oscar nominations.Pundits, including myself, can foam at the mouth about snubs - theyre more exciting than writing about expected, worthy nominees. But this one feels like more than a snub, call it an injustice.I dont know a single audience member or critic who hasnt raved about Oyelowos performance as Martin Luther King Jr. Not one. If you find a review saying its a lacklustre performance, please e-mail it to me, Id love to see it.Of course, the whispers - and a few shouts - on Oscar nominations day were those old chestnuts about elderly white Oscar voters. But this snub isnt about racism. Lets not forget that last years best picture winner was 12 Years A Slave, a harr [url=https://www.cups-stanley.uk]stanley cup[/url] owing story of slavery told from a slaves point of view. If AMPAS voters are flat-out racist, theres no way they would have been brave enough to champion that brilliant film.I would also have loved to see Selma director Ava DuVernay among the best director nominees, and of course her defenders say perhaps she wasnt in the mix because shes not only black, shes also a woman.But I think her snub c [url=https://www.stanleyusa.us]stanley usa[/url] an be explained more simply by it being a strong year; shes in good comp [url=https://www.stanleycup.ro]stanley romania[/url] any with other lo |
| Reply : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|