Admission and adoption were the main processes behind the continuity of families in Ancient Rome, unable to have descendants naturally. These were complex processes that had consequences both socially and politically, being increasingly used by emperors or nobles / heads of Roman families who did not have heirs to the throne.

Roman law was an important cornerstone for current law systems, being considered "the basis of civil law" in Romanian law. In the contemporary period, Roman law is being studied to provide a better understanding of the origins of certain institutions and law processes, thus enriching the general culture, especially in the legal field of the future jurist. This is the reason for choosing this essay theme.

The need to criminalize criminal participation results from the high social danger posed by several criminals committed by the criminal law, as this is the main reason for choosing this topic. Related criminal offenses, material and intellectual contributions of offenders considerably increase the danger to society and criminal law can not ignore this reality in the field of crime. There are offenses that may be committed by one person, but most of these crimes are committed by more than one person, the explanation of this cooperation for committing a crime is that it creates the possibility of safer execution, it is ensured removing obstacles more easily and there are more chances of success.

For an offense to be proven and automatically to punish the perpetrator, it is necessary to study in detail the evidence in the judicial proceedings. The material traces of the offense, ie the objects with which the offense was committed, namely: weapons, stains, fingerprints, etc. constitute the direct evidence of the offense, which in turn is joined by the indirect evidence of the offense, ie the statements given by the acquaintances about the event, objective persons who indirectly participated in the crime, namely the witnesses.

I chose to analyze the public administration in Dacia in terms of both stages known by this state, respectively, both during the Dacian monarchy and during the Roman province of Dacia. The work is structured in relation to these two stages, as well as the historical, political, economic factors that have influenced the administrative organization of Dacia. I wanted to study the types of public administration and better understand the difference between the administrative institutions of the two Dacians.

The conflicts that took place around 1929 make it necessary to adopt the „Law on the Organization of the General Police of the State” on July 21 by King Mihai I, a law that seeks to oversee and extract information. New Articles Appear: Article 37 which provides for the tasks and responsibilities of the policeman or Article 95 which states that the police are not obliged to wear uniforms. The main function in the state is detained by the Ministry of the Interior, which exercises its leading position throughout the country. Public order is provided by police. Art.137 specifies the structural reorganization of the Police School established in 1920. An important role is played by the Directorate of the Security Police, which aims to centralize the information, to perform obvious works of the population, to issue opinions for obtaining Romanian citizenship, as well as the Detective Corps with the purpose of retrieving information via filing, telephone and mail interceptions, etc., as well as the Guardian Public Guard, which provides security on the territory of the city, being the most numerous police personnel.

In a constantly evolving society such as the contemporary one, where the subject of law no longer acts only as a natural person, but especially in economically organized groups as legal persons, the lawyer had to adapt the field criminal law towards the achievement of the objectives of establishing criminal liability, namely the defense of society against crimes. I appreciate that the criminal responsibility of the legal person is an institution that requires a thorough analysis and, by law ferenda, an adaptation of the institution due to the implications of the contradictory interpretations in the matter.

We draw attention to a comparative analysis of the provisions on criminal liability of the legal person, an institution included both in the New Penal Code and in the Old Criminal Code. Thus, we draw attention to a remark that needs to be considered for an improvement in the content of the institution of criminal liability of moral persons, namely that in the New Code the legislature chose to group all these provisions into a single title of the general party Title IV) as opposed to C.pen in 1968 where the provisions relating to this liability were spread across the various headings of the Code, which were more numerous