The "+gil" suffix, which comes to names in Turkish and derives the names of kinship, family and relationship from them, is one of the controversial suffixes due to its origin. Although there is a general consensus on the use and function of the suffix, there is no agreement on the origin of it. Various researches have put forward ideas about the origin of the +gil suffix. Some of them have supposed that the suffix is a compound of two suffixes and the others have been on the opinion that the suffix originates from a single word or a particle. While these studies generally do not give determinations about the word or particle on which the suffix is based; only the relationship situation of the suffix and the word "kil", which means house in Chuvash Turkic, has been discussed in detail. In this study, by defending the opinion that the +gil suffix originates from an independent structure in ancient times, which has been also voiced by many researchers, it also will be defended that the +gil suffix was originated from the same root with the +lAr suffix which has similar functions with the +gil and thought to derive from the a-lar / an-lar (personal pronoun + plural suffix) structure. It will be tried to prove that a structure originating from *+l plural suffix and a pronoun-based word in both Turkic and Altaic languages are in the structure of +gil suffix.

The improvement of the legislation in the onymic system is one of the actual problems serving to the development of onomastics according to the demand of the time. The basic means of the regulation in the sphere of the onomastics is the codification of the official forms of these names. Codification (codifying) in onomastics is the systematization of the normative juridical acts connected with the proper names by improvement them from the point of view of form and content and regulation of the language norms. The social and political changes in the society cause the formation of the different disputed speech situations and as a result of it increase the applied problems demanding the special linguistic and interdisciplinary explorations. To regulate these conflicts mostly demands juridical interference. The object of the article is the proper names in the Azerbaijan language. The purpose of the investigation is to determine the principles of the codification activity, analyze the functions carrying out by the proper names, propose motions for the systematization and coordination of the problems in the sphere of Azerbaijan onomastics. The methodological base of the article consists of the systematic analysis, descriptive, complex and classification methods. The article deals with the study of the specification of the usage of the proper names in the juridical sphere as a language unit, codification of the name forms, the factors substantiating this process and the main directions of the onomastic activity.

Many studies were done in the past on the phonetic structure of Turkic and it continues to be done today. Most of these studies evaluate each Turkic dialect in its own way. However, in the some etymology studies and various articles and dissertions, comparative phonetic analyse is also made. These evaluations do not give a detailed result in terms of phonetics about the whole Turkic and they maintain their value as various information. As of the point reached in the studies on the Turkic, it is a great task to write the comparative phonetics of Turkic dialects. In this study, the importance and necessity of such study will be emphasized through examples.

The Turk presence in India dates back to BC. In the 9th century, with the conversion of the Uighurs to religions such as Buddhism and Brahmanism, religious and cultural elements of Indian origin began to spread among the Turks. Turk dominance in India, which started with Gazneli Mahmud at the beginning of the 10th century, continued with the periods of the Delhi Turk Sultanate, Gurlus, Halachs, Tugluks, Timurids. The Mughal domination, which started in the 16th century, lasted until the middle of the 19th century. During this period, a significant part of India became Islamized and Turkic increased its importance. In this process, Turkic, which was used side by side with Arabic and Persian among the members of the dynasty and Muslims, was taught with dictionaries and grammar books as well as being a literary language, became a daily communication language and thus preserved its importance for centuries. However, Turkic, which started to lose its power since the beginning of the 20th century, is taught only at an academic level in a limited area today and lives with its memories in the languages used in India.