The “nazirecilik” tradition has an important place in the Divan poetry. Some nazires were written with the objective of following in the footsteps of the master poets. An unpretentious and respectful style are conspicuous in these types of nazires. Whereas, in this article, it will be attempted to examine from the aspect of form and contents in accordance with the divançe by Mehmet Sefik Efendi, who was a poet who lived in the last century of the divan poetry and whose poems were resembling those by Keçeci-zâde Izzet Molla, who was accepted to be an expert.

Classical Turkish Literature has extremely rich and important works from historical and literal perspective. The magazine that is one of these works, is the sources in which poetry takes place. In these sources, it is possible to find poems that most poets do not have in their divans or other works. The introduction of these works in question and the tranference of them to these days are to conduce new interpretations and informations and also appearance of several great poens that known before. Since the magazine reflects a certain literary taste, it is also tol et the interpretations about poems. For this reason, the magazin’s amang the first sources that Classical Literature researchs apply. The aim of this article is to introduce poetry magazine that is registered in Millet Library by the none of “Hicivler Mecmu?asi”.This poetry magazine which is the sugeet of the article and wich has not definite wirter has been chosen as the subject of the paperc since it has not been studied before poetry in the magazine belongs to famous writers of XIX. Century and indudes satir and jokes as a kinds. In this article information about the magazine the parts taking place in this work and examples of poems and satirs of these work. Further more, the magazine has been introduced by putting emphasis on the language narration of peoms and the styliestic feature and contant of the work.

Sir Gerard Clauson was mostly interested in the Old and Middle Turkic fields in Turkic philology. Old Turkic inscriptions have always been the focus of his attention. Clauson’s dictionary titled “An Etymological Dictionary of Pre-Thirteenth Century Turkish” (1972) is a remarkable work. He wa a philologist who tried to read Old Turkic inscriptions attentively and to understand them correctly. There are many corrections he made in the Old Turkic inscriptions. These corrections will be listed in this article.