This study to analyze the influence of company size, profitability of the Company, the Company Solvency, Auditor Opinion, Earning Per Share and Total Audit Committee Audit Delay either partially or simultaneously on the company LQ 45 listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014. This study uses quantitative data in the form of financial statements are derived from website www.idx.co.id and www.sahamok.co.id, sampling technique used purposive sampling technique. Sample of 39 companies. Then, the data analysis technique used is descriptive statistics, classical assumption test and multiple linear regression analysis using SPSS program. The results showed that: (1) The size of the Company has no significant effect on Audit Delay, shown with sig 0.109> 0.05 (2) Profitability perusahaa no significant effect on Audit Delay, shown with sig 0.083> 0.05 ( 3) Solvency Company has no significant influence on Audit Delay, shown with sig 0.730> 0.05 (4) Opinion Auditor has no significant effect on the Audit Delay, indicated by the value 0.738> 0.05 (5) EPS has a significant influence the audit Delay, shown with sig 0.030 0.05 (7) Company Size, Profitability, Solvency, Auditor Opinion, EPS, and Total Audit Committee simultaneously affect the Audit Delay, shown with sig 0.005 <0.05.

The Government has launched a policy of taxation through the Minister of Finance numbered 191/PMK.010/2015 on Revaluation of Fixed Assets Proposed in the Year 2015 and 2016. Impact of revaluation, automatically has consequences to the increase on depreciation expenses of fixed assets are charged to the profit and loss next period, so company will have benefit from the revaluation of these assets. But Fixed Assets Revaluation for tax purposes is not free. There are taxes to be paid, especially if the asset after revaluation is sold to a third party, then the taxpayer will be charged as additional income tax. If the company still wants to take the program of the asset revaluation, fixed assets after the revaluation prohibited for sale to another party until the depreciation of assets ending.

Transfer pricing phenomenon could be happened based on management motivation in order to tax avoidance or another opportunistic behavior, especially to do wealth transfer among related parties. Ownership stucture can affect management to transfer wealth the themselves or to majority stakeholder. Bonus plan and debt covenant also used by the company to get high profit. This study aimed to examine the effect of tax, ownership of foreign, bonus plan and debt covenant on the company’s decision to perform transfer pricing of all manufacturing company listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange. Sample selection was using purposive sampling method with final sample 26 companies in 104 observation from 2012-2015. The analysis technique used on this study is a binary logistic regression. The result shows that tax and ownership of foreign have significantly effect on the company’s decision to perform transfer pricing. The determination coefficient is 0,379 that means 37.9% transfer pricing is affected by independent variables. While the rest is explained by other variable in outside of this study that can explain transfer pricing.

This study to analyze the influence of company size, profitability of the Company, the Company Solvency, Auditor Opinion, Earning Per Share and Total Audit Committee Audit Delay either partially or simultaneously on the company LQ 45 listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014. This study uses quantitative data in the form of financial statements are derived from website www.idx.co.id and www.sahamok.co.id, sampling technique used purposive sampling technique. Sample of 39 companies. Then, the data analysis technique used is descriptive statistics, classical assumption test and multiple linear regression analysis using SPSS program. The results showed that: (1) The size of the Company has no significant effect on Audit Delay, shown with sig 0.109> 0.05 (2) Profitability perusahaa no significant effect on Audit Delay, shown with sig 0.083> 0.05 ( 3) Solvency Company has no significant influence on Audit Delay, shown with sig 0.730> 0.05 (4) Opinion Auditor has no significant effect on the Audit Delay, indicated by the value 0.738> 0.05 (5) EPS has a significant influence the audit Delay, shown with sig 0.030 0.05 (7) Company Size, Profitability, Solvency, Auditor Opinion, EPS, and Total Audit Committee simultaneously affect the Audit Delay, shown with sig 0.005 <0.05.