A 5 year old female presented to clinic with a lump under her chin. She had a similar lump two months ago but the parents stated that it spontaneously resolved in a few days. There was no history of fever and there were no pets. Her past medical history was significant for epilepsy which was controlled with zonisamide. On physical examination a 3x2.5 cm, soft, nontender, nonmobile submental mass and perioral dermatitis were noted. (Figures 1, 2) A complete blood count (CBC) and an ultrasound (US) were ordered.

Objective: To determine the frequency of diabetic among stroke patients and to compare the pattern of stroke in diabetic and non-diabetic stroke patients admitted at a tertiary care hospital in Hyderabad, Sindh. Methods: A cross sectional study enrolled 148 consecutive adult acute stroke patients admitted at Liaquat University Hospital, Hyderabad, during Sep 2014 to Feb 2015. Demographic, clinical, radio-imaging and laboratory data were collected on structured questionnaire to identify diabetes, type of stroke and different risk factors of stroke. Data was entered and analysed by using SPSS version 16. Association was seen by using Pearson’s Chi-square test and Independent t test. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 148 acute stroke cases were enrolled in the study. Males were 92 (62%). Mean age of study participants was 51.21 ± 10.19 years. Diabetes was found in 104 (70.3%) stroke patients. Ischemic stroke was seen in 101 (68.2%) and haemorrhagic stroke seen in 47 (31.8) stroke patients. Diabetes was more common in ischemic stroke 81 (80.2) as compared to haemorrhagic stroke 23 (48.9%) (P< 0.05). Hospital mortality of stroke patients was 37 (25%). No difference of mortality in diabetic and non-diabetic (P>0.05) stroke patients was recorded. Conclusion: Diabetes was found in majority of stroke patients. Ischemic stroke was more common than haemorrhagic stroke. Ischaemic stroke is more prevalent in diabetic whereas haemorrhagic stroke was more in non-diabetic stroke patients. Prognosis of stroke was bad in both diabetic and non-diabetic stroke patients.

Background: Lumbo-pelvic (LPP) pain is common and non specific problem during pregnancy and post partum. Despite the fact that perinatal pyogenic sacroiliitis (PSI) during this period is rare, it should be considered as a vital differential diagnosis in women who have debilitating lower back and pelvic girdle pain. Case: A 34 years old primigravida presented to the emergency department with extreme right sided lower back pain radiating to the right gluteal region and down to the back of the right thigh. This pain began twelve days prior to her presentation and eventually worsened to the point that she could not stand or walk. Her vital signs were within normal limits, and she was febrile. Apart from a slight widening of the symphysis pubis, her pelvic and lumbo-sacral plain x-rays revealed no important findings. With the clinical impression of right LPP, the patient was admitted for pain management and further inquiries. Conclusion: Despite the fact that lower back and pelvic girdle pain are normal throughout pregnancy and the postpartum period, perinatal PSI is uncommon. It is a tough diagnosis to make because the symptoms and signs are not clear, and the tests are not definitive. When pathognomonic clinical and radiologic signs indicate an infectious process and isolation of pathogenic bacteria is not possible, medical management with empirical antibiotics should not be delayed.